What do I think about quantitative vs qualitative vs mixed?
Qualitative research targets complete and descriptive sequences of events, while quantitative research explores statistical models to explain events. Both methods have their strengths but I imagine that it is the type of question that the action research attempts to answer that may determine the chosen method. I wonder if a mixed method research model would be more comprehensive, but imagine that more time would be needed in order to collect the data in different ways. What is the value of each? The value of the qualitative method is that it provides intimate details about the subject matter within the natural environment. This type of research is looking at variables in their natural setting where they are commonly found. A benefit is that comprehensive data can be collected by open-ended questions that provide direct quotations and allow the investigation of the subjects to be covered in great detail. The interview component can be redirected or guided and revisions of questions can happen in the moment. During interviews of open ended questions, complexities and nuanced findings may emerge that might have been missed in the quantitative research model. In this model the number of individuals to be studied is rather small. This helps to simplify the research, particularly if permission is needed by the subject matters. And while only a few subjects are needed and researched in order to compile data, it depends on the human experience and is, therefore, much more compelling. Challenges can be that the researcher/interviewer is inexperienced and proper data collection and analysis depends on this, particularly when trying to remain unbiased. In the end, the data collected may be vast and therefore hard to determine specific outcomes. The quantitative methods uses precise statistics to seek data concerning the action research question. An obvious benefit being that the data is accurate and can be tested. The researcher can seek the data most objectively leaving little to no room for biases to play a part in the outcomes. The dependent and independent variables can be studied in detail. The set back seems to be that the information is not necessarily gained in a natural setting or take into account the variations of individuals within the study. Another issue is that to lend accuracy to the data the researcher must study a large group and this can be a challenge particularly in maintaining the amount of participants and getting written permission if needed. What method have I chosen? I have chosen the qualitative method of research, as mine is a study of individual students' behaviors. This type of research lends itself to finding social meaning in context and how it affects individuals. I like that it does not have a strict design plan and that I can adapt my interview to the needs and abilities of the individuals in order to draw as much information from them as I can. I also see that this is a good starting point. It appears that much research begins this way in order to better focus the topic of research. I imagine that next semester I will be adapting this study to include a mixed method research technique. How will this method answer the research questions? This method will best answer the question whether systematic mindfulness practice will help kindergarten students to learn, particularly those that are enduring stressful home situations. The observation piece is the most critical I think in finding the data. This study relies greatly on the observed changes of behaviors in the school environment.
0 Comments
|
AuthorJennifer Wade ArchivesCategories |